Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Mermaids: still not the new vampires

[inspired by this Slate article: Mermaids are not the new vampires]

The concept of something being the “new vampires” is almost exactly like the concept of something being the “new black” — it’s a joke. There is no new black. There is never a new black. Black is black for a reason. Vampires are vampires for a reason.

Sure, for a while I was joking that pirates were the new zombies were the new vampires, but it was a joke. And pirates and zombies can walk on land, and are traditionally seen as monsters, or at least anti-heroes, so that puts them WAY closer to vampires at the outset.

If mer-people are your deal, great. No problem there. But mythological tropes aren’t infinitely malleable — they don’t all mean everything at the same time. For the most part, you can’t take a vampire story and plug in a merperson instead. And if the myth you choose doesn’t affect the story you tell, why use the myth at all?

There’s a reason vampires rule the world of fantastical fiction the way they do. I can’t tell you for sure what that reason is — I have speculated wildly about it on many a convention panel, and my go-to explanation is: vampires are a potent symbol of ambivalence, and we live in a deeply ambivalent age.

Similarly, I have a go-to explanation about why werewolves always seem to play second fiddle to the vampires who are otherwise their close mythological cousins: because of the way cinema dominates our collective mythmaking, and vampire visual effects are just plain easier to do well than werewolf effects. So vampires rule the theater, and this causes them to dominate in written literature as well.

But those are just educated guesses. There’s something ineffable about what makes certain narrative tropes resonate. They just do. Maybe, in a different social and physical environment — the Waterworld world, for example — merpeople would be the go-to myth.

Only, in that world, they would probably be terrifying/misunderstood undead monsters who threaten our concept of ourselves as humans, and instead of being, generically, “fish” people, they would actually be humans who sometimes turn into GIANT MAN-EATING SHARKS.

Originally published at Goth House. You can comment here or there.


( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
Aug. 6th, 2013 08:52 pm (UTC)
I would read that mer-shark book. And the softer, kinder, more misunderstood version would have them turning into Orcas. Or something.
Aug. 6th, 2013 09:11 pm (UTC)
You might be amused that, no sooner had I written that, than I started trying to craft a short story involving the terrifying merpeople of an inundated world.
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

October 2016


Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com